Dozuki • 2024 • 12 weeks
Dozuki: Course Redesign
How Redesigning Courses Boosted User Engagement by 10x
Overview
Project Goals
-
Learn and Identify root causes of low adoption and optimize the user journey through user research.
​ -
Enhance the course assignment experience with features that align with user needs to drive adoption.
-
Make courses easier to use for new customers as well as existing customers.
Project Outcomes
-
A successful core feature redesign within 12 weeks.
​ -
Increased average courses created by customers by 10x.
-
Increased customer adoption by 35%. From 170 > 230.
Courses Value Proposition
-
Manufacturing companies must train new employees and familiarize them with their standard operating procedures.
​ -
Continuous improvement: After frontline workers are trained, supervisors retrain workers as a refresher.
-
Filling manufacturing gaps by figuring out who they need to replace when people are retire or calls out sick.
Challenge & Problem
The Challenge
How might we
Redesign Dozuki's course experience to better align with new and existing customers' workflows, ensuring they derive maximum value from courses?
Problems
-
Dozuki’s Information architecture didn’t match customer’s mental model around courses, making it difficult to use courses without a spreadsheet.
​ -
Important actions being hidden made it hard for users to create courses, leaving training supervisors unsure of how to create a course.
-
Inefficient user experience when managing courses, making it difficult for training supervisors to view who has done what and who can operate what machine.
Qual Research
Qualitative Research
To understand the reasons why and how customers are thinking courses for their manufacturing business, I scheduled 1:1 interviews with existing customers.
Research Goals
-
Identify the biggest pain points, blockers, and workarounds related to courses.
​ -
Understand their end-to-end workflow for implementing courses.
Workflow Diagrams
Trainer-led courses and training
self-guided courses and training
Quantifying Existing Screens
Testing Existing Screens
Prior to redesigning courses, the team had assumptions that we wanted validate and to set a baseline metric to compare the redesign to. We didn't have any existing data.
Existing Screens Highlights
Assumptions
Stats
Assumption correct?
Users don’t know where to assign a specific course to a user
See heatmap
🚫
Users don’t know where to assign a specific course to a user
4.00/5.00 Confidence
🚫
Users don’t know how to assign a course from course details
32 sec average (mean)
✅
Users are unsure of what the percentages (%) represent in relation to the course
100% don't know
✅
All Courses Page
Create a New Course
Edit & Assign Existing Course
100% of users (n=15) got it wrong. Didn't know how to assign or edit existing course
Existing Experience
Insight 1
Dozuki’s current course experience failed to match customer’s mental model and workflow leaving them unsure how to implement courses in their business.
Customers expressed concerns about the lack of flexibility in course structure and desired more freedom to group courses according to their preferences.
Recommendation 1
Create a course IA (information architecture) to match our customer’s mental model by providing user flexibility to group courses into ‘course groups’.
✅ Outcomes
📈 Increased average course created who uses courses from 1 course > 10 courses (10x increase)
📈 170 customers using courses to 230 customers (35% increase).
🙌 After restructuring the course information architecture, customers indicated that the new hierarchy made courses feel like a valuable addition to their workflow.
Insight & Design 2
Insight 2
Users had low confidence (3.4/5.0, n=15) on how to add content when creating courses due to the lack of clear descriptions.
Customers knew how to add content in a course, however wasn't very confident.
Recommendation 2
Enhance user understanding of how to create a content inside a course using well placed buttons with clear language and hierarchical structure, addressing user confusion and improving course creation.
✅ Outcomes
📈 After restructuring the website content, our recent usability test revealed that all users found the actions faster (6.5 sec > 5 sec)
📈 Higher confidence (3.4/5.0 > 4.4/5.0) to add content in a more efficient manner.
Insight & Design 3
Insight 3
Users don't understand how to assign a course when viewing it in detail (0%, n=15), which makes them feel like they're wasting a lot of time.
Customers expressed concerns about the lack of flexibility in course structure and desired more freedom to group courses according to their preferences.
Recommendation 3
Help users assign courses by revealing primary actions and implementing a clear hierarchical structure, addressing user confusion.
✅ Outcomes
🚅 After placing actions in better locations, more users found assignment actions faster.
🚅 32 seconds > 6.2 seconds and their actions were more accurate.
Insight & Design 4
Insight 4
Users are frustrated because the current course tracking experience doesn’t align with how supervisors envision tracking course progress.
Supervisors are wanting to track course progress by
-
Courses - Find the course and figure out is taking the course and what their progress looks like.
-
Everyone at the company must complete this course.
-
-
Teams - Find the team to track all the courses that they are taking and their progress.
-
Every member on a team needs to complete a course on the machine that team is responsible for.
-
-
Individuals - Find the individual and track their courses progress.
-
A new employee must complete all assigned courses before starting work to meet regulatory and compliance requirements.
-
Recommendation 4
Improve course tracking for supervisors by providing the three different methods they prefer for monitoring courses.
✅ Outcomes
🚅 By providing multiple ways to view course progress, we received feedback that it enabled trainers to quickly identify gaps and manage courses according to their preferences.
Next Steps
Next Steps
With the initial redesign, we received valuable feedback from customers, supported by data from the team. However, one area still missing was addressing the challenge of filling manufacturing gaps in the workforce. The team gathered further feedback and is now exploring solutions to help customers address gaps caused by employee absences, resignations, or retirements.
Our course redesign has laid a strong foundation, enabling customers to identify training gaps. The ultimate goal is to ensure these gaps are filled so that manufacturing processes remain uninterrupted and avoid slowdowns.